Global minimum tax is no longer a policy discussion. It is a permanent feature of how international business operates. Under the OECD BEPS 2.0 framework, large multinational enterprise groups now face an effective tax rate of 15 percent across jurisdictions. According to the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department and the OECD, Hong Kong has implemented this regime for in-scope groups from 2025, shaping what many refer to as the Hong Kong global minimum tax landscape.

This shift directly affects how Hong Kong MNEs plan growth, assess risk, and allocate capital. The impact goes beyond tax compliance. It influences where management sits, how expansion decisions are evaluated, and how returns are measured in 2026 and beyond.

This article examines how the global minimum tax affects Hong Kong MNEs from a business perspective, offering practical guidance for entrepreneurs who must balance growth ambitions with an evolving global tax environment.

Global minimum tax as a crucial factor

Global minimum tax marks a shift in global business economics, where expansion decisions now begin with a guaranteed minimum tax cost.

How the minimum tax introduces a baseline cost 

Under the OECD Global Anti-Base Erosion or GloBE model rules, multinational enterprise groups with consolidated revenues of at least 750 million euros are required to pay an effective tax rate of no less than 15 percent on profits earned in each jurisdiction where they operate. Hong Kong incorporated these rules into domestic law in 2025 through the Inland Revenue Amendment Minimum Tax for Multinational Enterprise Groups Ordinance. The Hong Kong Minimum Top Up Tax and Income Inclusion Rule applies for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2025(1).

From a business perspective, this framework introduces a predictable and structural cost layer to international operations. Global minimum tax changes how profits are assessed when entering new markets, allocating capital, or designing supply chains. The tax outcome is no longer driven primarily by local headline rates or targeted incentives. Instead, it is shaped by the group’s overall effective tax position.

This shift creates a new baseline for evaluating expansion opportunities. You may need to assume that profits generated in lower tax jurisdictions will be subject to additional tax elsewhere within the group. As a result, tax becomes part of the initial feasibility analysis.

What it means for pricing and margins

Minimum tax affects pricing and margins because it alters net return expectations across jurisdictions. Companies entering a new market may previously have modelled profitability based on local statutory tax rates, expected incentives, or exemptions. With a 15 percent global minimum tax in place, those calculations change.

In particular, a jurisdiction that once appeared attractive due to low headline corporate tax can deliver lower post-tax returns when top-up obligations are included. This influence cascades into product pricing and margin management because the minimum tax affects the profitability benchmark used for decisions. The new rules make it essential for Hong Kong MNEs to forecast after-tax profitability instead of relying solely on pre-tax models.

Framing tax as a strategic input

Minimum tax is now a crucial variable that sits alongside labour cost, compliance risk, supply chain design, and regulatory considerations. By integrating minimum tax into early decision frameworks, companies can better align expansion plans with financial and operational goals in 2026 and beyond. The shift in mindset helps leaders navigate risks, optimise resource allocation, and sustain competitive advantage in a more interconnected global economy.

Group size and structure shape business decisions

In the context of the global minimum tax, the structure of a multinational enterprise may influence its exposure more than the geographic location of profits.

Why the scale of your business matters

In Hong Kong’s implementation of the OECD BEPS 2.0 rules(2), only large multinational enterprise groups with consolidated revenue of at least 750 million euros are within the scope of the global minimum tax regime.  This threshold means that exposure is determined at the group level rather than at the level of individual subsidiaries.

Effective tax rates and potential top-up tax liabilities are calculated based on aggregated global results. Structural complexity across jurisdictions increases the likelihood that certain entities fall below the minimum effective tax rate, even if other parts of the group are taxed at higher levels. For growing MNEs, crossing the revenue threshold becomes a strategic inflection point.

Organisational design considerations for planning

Corporate structure decisions are intersecting with business strategy. Consequently, functions such as intellectual property ownership, financing arrangements, and regional service hubs require reassessment not only for operational efficiency but also for their impact on the group’s effective tax rate.

For example, models that historically delivered tax advantages may contribute to a lower consolidated effective rate under the global minimum tax framework. This outcome could trigger additional top-up tax liabilities, including under Hong Kong’s domestic minimum top-up tax. As a result, leadership teams need to review whether existing entities remain fit for purpose in a post-minimum tax environment.

Management and reporting implications

Greater organization complexity often brings higher management and reporting demands. Finance and tax teams need stronger internal controls, more consistent data governance, and closer coordination with local management. Monitoring effective tax rates at both entity and group levels requires timely and reliable information.

While this increases administrative effort, it also creates opportunities for improved insight. Clearer visibility into tax outcomes will support better decisions and reduce the risk of unexpected liabilities.

Rethinking Hong Kong’s role in business expansion

As global minimum tax harmonises effective tax outcomes across markets, Hong Kong’s appeal may shift toward attributes that support operational scale, capital access, and execution certainty.

Institutional reliability and global financial centre standing

Hong Kong is ranked among the world’s leading financial centres and has consistently been in the top tier of global financial centre indices.

According to the Global Financial Centres Index, the city sits among the top three or four worldwide for financial centre competitiveness, reflecting institutional stability, regulatory clarity, and international participation(3). These elements may help multinational groups manage risk across the Asia Pacific, where consistent legal and regulatory interpretation reduces execution uncertainty.

Capital market scale and liquidity

Hong Kong’s capital markets remain among the largest globally. At the end of 2025, the city’s stock market was the world’s sixth largest by market capitalization and the third largest in Asia with around USD 6.19 trillion in total value. Daily trading volume has consistently been among the highest in the region(4).

Hong Kong also led global equity fundraising in 2025, with vibrant IPO activity and continued strong listings from both domestic and international issuers. These figures illustrate deep liquidity and broad institutional participation that can assist Hong Kong MNEs in raising capital and deploying resources efficiently.

Financial services ecosystem

Hong Kong hosts an extensive financial ecosystem. Over 70 of the world’s top 100 banks operate in the city, and the region remains a major hub for wealth and asset management(5). This concentration of financial institutions enables efficient corporate banking, treasury, risk management, and investment execution across jurisdictions, which becomes increasingly valuable when tax planning is integrated with operating performance.

Connectivity and talent

Hong Kong’s connectivity is another measurable advantage. Its international airport connects to more than 200 destinations(6), supporting rapid mobility of management and facilitating regional coordination. The professional talent pool, encompassing legal, financial, and corporate leadership expertise, supports complex multinational operations. These factors enhance operational performance even as the global minimum tax reduces the emphasis on jurisdictional tax rates.

Together, these numbers suggest that Hong Kong’s strategic value increasingly hinges on institutional strength, market depth, and global connectivity.

To conclude 

The global minimum tax represents a long-term structural shift rather than a temporary regulatory adjustment. As more jurisdictions adopt OECD standards, Hong Kong multinational enterprises now operate in an environment shaped by the Hong Kong global minimum tax, where tax outcomes increasingly reflect economic substance, group scale, and strategic decision-making.

Accordingly, early integration of global minimum tax considerations into business strategy is essential. From expansion planning to capital allocation, leaders need a clear view of post-tax returns under the new framework. Engaging with local experts can provide practical insights, ensure regulatory alignment, and support effective scenario planning.

Looking ahead, sustainable growth for Hong Kong MNEs will depend on proactive planning, strong regional coordination, and disciplined execution. Don’t hesitate to contact us at service@bbcincorp.com. with any questions or concerns about doing business in Hong Kong. We look forward to assisting you with your business needs.

References:

(1) https://www.ird.gov.hk/eng/tax/bus_beps.htm

(2) https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/global-minimum-tax.html

(3) https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202509/25/P2025092500970.htm

(4) https://www.brandhk.gov.hk/docs/default-source/factsheets-library/hong-kong-themes/2026-01-06/international-financial-centre_en_jan-2026.pdf

(5) https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/key-functions/banking/

(6) https://www.hongkongairport.com/en/media-centre/press-release/2025/pr_1797

Disclaimer: While BBCIncorp strives to make the information on this website as timely and accurate as possible, the information itself is for reference purposes only. You should not substitute the information provided in this article for competent legal advice. Feel free to contact BBCIncorp’s customer services for advice on your specific cases.

Share this article

Industry News & Insights

Get helpful tips and info from our newsletter!

Stay in the know and be empowered with our strategic how-tos, resources, and guidelines.