Best Crypto-Friendly Countries for Business Formation & Operations

Digital assets have rapidly transformed the global financial landscape, with values experiencing unprecedented fluctuations. This volatility has prompted growing interest in cryptocurrencies as a potential avenue for sustainable wealth creation. To safeguard investments and ensure regulatory compliance, many entrepreneurs are considering doing business in crypto-friendly countries.

In today’s article, we examine leading countries for setting up a crypto enterprise, focusing on clarity, tax advantages, and offshore opportunities. These jurisdictions offer endless potential. However, it is essential to recognize the inherent risks, particularly for those new to the sector, and to approach investment decisions with careful planning and informed guidance.

Best crypto-friendly countries for digital assets 

Regulatory frameworks for digital assets are evolving rapidly in many jurisdictions, and 2025 has brought several important developments to most crypto-friendly countries.

United States

In the U.S., the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classifies cryptoassets as property, meaning gains and losses are recognized when an asset is sold, exchanged, or used for payment. Staking rewards, mining proceeds, and airdrops are generally treated as ordinary income at the time they are received. Later dispositions may generate capital gains or losses.

As of January 2025, the IRS requires certain brokers to report crypto transactions on Form 1099-DA, including detailed information on sales and exchanges. This expanded reporting makes sure that taxable events, including token swaps and payments with cryptocurrency, are tracked and reported.

United Kingdom

In the UK, cryptoassets are not legal tender but are fully recognized for taxation purposes. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) treats disposals, such as selling, swapping, or using crypto for purchases, as chargeable events under Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Income from activities like mining, staking, or airdrops may also be subject to Income Tax.

Starting January 2026, cryptoasset service providers must comply with the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), collecting detailed transaction and user data for reporting to HMRC. The measures aim to improve transparency and link individual transactions to tax reporting. Enforcement is increasing, with HMRC sending more compliance letters and updating guidance to clarify the responsibilities of both providers and taxpayers.

Germany

Germany offers a relatively favorable tax regime for private crypto investors under § 23 of the Income Tax Act (EStG). Profits from the sale of crypto held for more than twelve months are generally tax-exempt. If you dispose of crypto within a year, the gain can be taxable, but only if your net profits exceed €1,000 in that tax year.

Income from staking, mining, airdrops, or other crypto rewards is recognized as ordinary income at the time received, valued in euros. The Federal Ministry of Finance clarified in March 2025 that taxpayers must maintain detailed records of all crypto transactions, including timestamps, wallet addresses, transaction types, and fiat values. Although political discussions exist regarding a potential change to the one-year exemption, no law has been enacted.

Switzerland

Swiss regulators continue to take a cautious but structured approach. The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, FINMA, issued its Guidance 06/2024 on stablecoins in July 2024, clarifying minimum requirements for default guarantees and identity verification. Under this, stablecoin issuers may rely on bank guarantees to avoid a full banking licence, but those guarantees must meet strict conditions.

Additionally, FINMA prohibits anonymous transfers of stablecoins, calling for full customer identification in compliance with AML and FATF standards.

Singapore

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has implemented stricter regulations, leading to a tightening of the crypto regulatory environment in Singapore. As of 2025, all digital token service providers (DTSPs) that serve overseas clients must hold a MAS license under Singapore’s Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA). MAS has stated that the licensing bar for these overseas‑only providers is high, citing concerns about money laundering and supervision.

On the tax side, Singapore does not impose Capital Gains Tax on personal crypto trading as one of the countries with no crypto tax. Profits from buying and selling crypto as an individual are generally tax‑free. However, if you receive crypto as part of business income (for example, payment for services), that income might be taxed.

Finally, MAS’s 2025 updates also include stricter consumer protection. Licensed DTSPs are required to keep client assets segregated, perform daily reconciliations, and comply with KYC/AML standards.

United Arab Emirates 

In Dubai, on 19 May 2025, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) published Version 2.0 of its rulebooks, and it mandated that all Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) comply by 30 June 2025.

A notable innovation is the “sponsored VASP” model: smaller or newer firms can operate under a licensed sponsor, which handles regulatory responsibilities such as capital adequacy, audits, and reporting. VARA also revised its issuance framework. Per the new regime, Category 1 tokens (including stablecoins) require prior approval, whereas Category 2 tokens (e.g., utility tokens) must be distributed by licensed entities. 

At a federal level, the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) has introduced the Payment Token Services Regulation (PTSR), effective from August 2024, which governs fiat-referenced stablecoins (FRVAs). Under the regulation, issuers of non-AED stablecoins (a digital asset with a stable value, but its price is pegged to a currency other than the United Arab Emirates Dirham) must either register or be approved by the CBUAE, with additional restrictions on interest or incentive payments.

Hong Kong

Hong Kong has evolved into a fully supervised digital asset ecosystem through coordinated oversight by the Securities and Futures Commission and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Virtual Asset Trading Platforms must obtain licences and demonstrate strong custody procedures, market surveillance, segregation of client assets, and transparent listing practices.

In 2025, the Legislative Council introduced the fiat-referenced stablecoin framework, empowering the HKMA to authorise issuers and monitor compliance.

Additionally, Hong Kong also supports professional investors accessing advanced crypto instruments, such as derivatives, structured tokens, and custody solutions. Platforms must also comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing requirements, conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, and submit periodic reports.

British Virgin Islands

The British Virgin Islands regulates virtual asset businesses under the Virtual Assets Service Providers Act 2022. All operators, including exchanges, custodians, and token issuers, must register with the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and comply with governance, risk management, and AML/CTF standards. The Act also specifies internal control obligations, reporting requirements, and fit-and-proper criteria for directors and officers.

The jurisdiction imposes no personal or corporate income tax, nor capital gains tax, for most offshore structures. In addition, the BVI also provides established corporate structures for holding assets, conducting token issuance, or operating multi-jurisdictional entities for cryptocurrency in the BVI.

Seychelles

Seychelles introduced the Virtual Assets Service Providers Act 2024, establishing a licensing and supervisory regime for exchanges, custodians, and other service providers. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) manages licensing approvals, compliance monitoring, and enforcement. Companies are required to implement AML/CTF policies.

Cryptocurrency accepted countries offer low taxation and privacy protections for corporate owners. Still, VASP operators must maintain adequate reserves, implement custody safeguards, and establish contingency measures for operational disruptions. In reality, Seychelles has been used by several high-profile exchanges and service providers.

Cayman Islands

The Cayman Islands is a tax-neutral environment with no personal income, corporate income, or capital gains taxes for most international structures. The Virtual Asset Service Providers framework requires licensing, registration, and ongoing reporting for exchanges, custodians, and token issuers.

The regulatory regime includes clear licence categories, reporting standards, and audit obligations. As a result, the business must ensure the segregation of client assets, cybersecurity measures, and develop continuity plans. Cayman’s financial services infrastructure supports institutional-grade operations, including investment funds, custody solutions, and cross-border ventures under a recognised compliance structure.

Bahamas

The Commission licenses VASPs and supervises governance, custody, market conduct, and AML compliance. The operators in the Bahamas must file annual reports and may undergo inspections or audits to verify adherence to regulatory standards.

Tax free crypto countries do not impose personal income or capital gains taxes on most offshore entities. Licensed VASPs are also required to foster risk management policies, segregated client accounts, KYC procedures, and safeguards, including cybersecurity protocols.

Anguilla

Anguilla offers a streamlined framework for digital asset activities via the Digital Assets Business Act. The legislation sets licensing obligations and operational standards for VASPs and supports utility-token issuances. Tax neutrality applies to individuals and companies in most structures, with no personal or capital gains taxation.

The jurisdiction attracts early-stage projects, token issuers, and intellectual property holding entities that value simplified administration and transparent compliance requirements.

St Kitts and Nevis

St Kitts and Nevis requires all Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to register with the Financial Services Regulatory Commission. Licensed operators must implement anti-money laundering programs, maintain segregated client accounts, and submit regular reports on operations and compliance.

The jurisdiction does not levy personal income or capital gains taxes for most offshore entities. Its corporate law supports flexible structures for exchanges, custodians, and token projects for foreign and domestic businesses.

Panama

Panama is developing a regulatory framework for digital assets, with draft legislation outlining licensing, registration, and operational requirements for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). Proposed rules include AML/CTF compliance, transaction reporting, governance obligations, and fit-and-proper criteria for directors and senior management. The framework is intended to align with FATF standards and international best practices.

Although not fully enacted, Panama’s territorial tax system allows international entities to operate with minimal taxation on foreign-sourced income. Its corporate laws provide well-established structures for holding companies, exchanges, and cross-border ventures.

Cross-jurisdictional observations

When viewed together, regulatory trends point to several common themes.

First, reporting obligations are increasing: the U.S. is expanding broker disclosure via Form 1099-DA, and the EU’s MiCA regime demands consistent governance, transparency, and capital controls.

Second, stablecoins are under particular scrutiny: Switzerland requires identity verification and default guarantees, and Dubai imposes licensing and reserve rules for issuance.

Third, licensing complexity is rising, with newer frameworks in the EU and UAE requiring prior approval, and transitional arrangements giving regulated providers time to adjust.

Most importantly, many jurisdictions are aligning more closely with global standards such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

What defines a crypto-friendly country?

A crypto-friendly country is one that provides an environment where cryptocurrencies and blockchain businesses can operate with clarity and confidence. Key factors include transparent regulatory frameworks, clear rules for crypto trading, token issuance, and digital asset custody, and taxation policies that do not discourage investment.

In addition, jurisdictions with low or no capital gains tax, minimal income tax on crypto activities, and simple reporting obligations are generally more attractive to both investors and entrepreneurs.

Beyond taxation, the strength of the crypto ecosystem is critical. Countries with a well-developed infrastructure for digital finance, access to skilled talent, support for startups, and a growing number of blockchain firms offer advantages for long-term innovation. The presence of institutional support and integration with existing financial systems also contributes to a favorable environment. Singapore, for instance, is recognized as a leading hub.

There are pros and cons of having an offshore cryptocurrency company, and crypto tax-free countries provide legal certainty, tax efficiency, business support, and technological readiness.

The world’s least crypto-friendly countries

Despite the growing global adoption of cryptocurrencies, several countries maintain restrictive or unfriendly policies regarding cryptocurrencies. Below are four key examples where regulation or taxation creates obstacles for crypto investors and businesses.

China

China strictly regulates private cryptocurrency activities. Its central bank (the People’s Bank of China) has banned financial institutions from providing crypto‑related services. Further, domestic crypto exchanges remain shut down. Large mining operations have largely been forced to exit or suspend operations.

At the same time, China is pushing ahead with its own central bank digital currency (the digital yuan), signaling a shift away from decentralized private crypto.

In recent years, China has repeatedly emphasized the risks of financial instability and capital flight associated with private cryptocurrencies. For businesses and investors, the legal environment remains hostile: operating crypto platforms or providing related services is not viable under current regulations.

The Netherlands

In the Netherlands, cryptocurrency is treated under the “Box 3” wealth tax framework, which taxes the notional or “deemed” return on an individual’s net assets, including digital assets. According to tax guides, for 2025, the presumed return rate for “investments and other assets” is around 5.88% and is taxed at about 36%. Even without selling any crypto, holders may owe taxes simply for holding their assets.

If an individual engages in business‑like crypto activity (for example, mining or staking), income may fall under Box 1 (standard income tax), where higher tax rates apply. Therefore, the structure of the Dutch tax system penalizes long-term holding, creating significant administrative burdens for both ordinary investors and entrepreneurs.

Japan

Japan allows cryptocurrency under its Payment Services Act, but tax treatment is notoriously unfriendly. Gains from crypto are taxed as “miscellaneous income,” and combined national and local rates can reach very high levels depending on total income. Although exact rates vary, this structure effectively imposes steep taxes on crypto trading and profits.

Crypto firms and traders also face strict regulation. Licensed exchanges must comply with KYC/AML standards, reporting, and customer protection. The result is a legal environment that allows crypto activity, but taxes and compliance costs weigh heavily on both individuals and businesses.

India

India treats gains from Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), including cryptocurrencies, under Section 115BBH of its Income Tax Act. That means a flat 30% tax on all gains from VDA transfers, regardless of how long the asset was held. On top of that, there is a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) for many VDA transfer transactions; this applies even before profit is calculated.

According to the law, only the cost of acquisition can be deducted from taxable income; transaction fees, exchange commissions, and other costs are not eligible for deduction. Losses from VDA trades cannot be offset against other income, nor carried forward, making it especially difficult for traders who do not make consistent profits.

The mentioned countries exemplify different models of being “crypto-unfriendly.” China limits activity with a near‑total ban, the Netherlands taxes unrealized wealth, Japan burdens crypto income heavily, and India applies a flat, high-rate tax with tight reporting rules.

Conclusion

Digital assets have reshaped global finance, creating new opportunities for investment and business innovation. Crypto-friendly countries provide regulatory clarity, supportive infrastructure, and favorable taxation, enabling entrepreneurs to operate with confidence and compliance. Several examples are the U.S., the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, the UAE, Hong Kong, etc. as they offer structured frameworks for exchanges, custody, token issuance, and stablecoin operations.

Navigating these opportunities requires expertise and guidance to maximize benefits and stay compliant. For timely support in establishing or managing a crypto enterprise, please contact us at service@bbcincorp.com or chat directly with our support team.

Share this article